Member-only story

The Problem of Universals: Unraveling the Enigma in Contemporary Philosophy

Trevor Bell

·5.4k Followers· Follow

Published in The Problem Of Universals In Contemporary Philosophy

6 min read · 3 weeks before

585 View Claps

58 Respond

Save

Listen

The Problem of Universals in Contemporary Philosophy

by Bruce Bryans

4.6 out of 5

Language	:	English
File size	:	1086 KB
Text-to-Speech	:	Enabled
Screen Reader	:	Supported
Enhanced typesetting	:	Enabled
Word Wise	:	Enabled
Print length	:	241 pages

The problem of universals is a fundamental philosophical question that has perplexed thinkers for centuries. It revolves around the nature of abstract objects, such as properties, relations, and concepts, and their relationship to the concrete objects we perceive.

The Historical Debate

The debate over universals can be traced back to the ancient Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle. Plato argued that universals exist independently of particular objects and are the true objects of knowledge. Aristotle, on the other hand, held that universals are not real entities but rather immanent in the particular objects they characterize.

In the medieval era, the problem of universals was known as the quaestio de universalibus. Three main positions emerged: nominalism, realism, and conceptualism.

Nominalism: Universals are merely names or labels that we apply to groups of similar objects. They do not have any independent existence.
Realism: Universals are real entities that exist independently of particular objects. They are the underlying forms or essences that give objects their properties.
Conceptualism: Universals are mental concepts that we form based on our experience of particular objects. They do not have an independent existence but are not mere names either.

Contemporary Perspectives

The problem of universals continues to be a topic of active debate in contemporary philosophy. There is no single accepted solution, but several influential theories have been proposed.

One prominent approach is Platonic realism, which argues that universals exist in a separate realm of abstract entities. This realm is often referred to as the "Platonic heaven" or the "world of Forms." Some contemporary philosophers, such as David Lewis, have defended versions of Platonic realism.

Another influential approach is Aristotelian realism, which holds that universals are real but are not separate from particular objects. Rather, they are immanent in the objects themselves and constitute their essential properties. Contemporary Aristotelian realists include Richard Boyd and Fred Dretske.

Conceptualism is still another approach to the problem of universals. Conceptualists argue that universals are not real entities but are rather mental concepts that we use to organize our experience of the world. Contemporary conceptualists include Hilary Putnam and Ruth Millikan.

Recent Advancements

In recent years, there have been several exciting developments in the philosophy of universals. One area of progress has been the development of new theories of abstraction. Abstraction is the process by which we form concepts and universals from our experience of particular objects.

Another area of progress has been the development of new theories of reference. Reference is the way in which words and other symbols refer to objects in the world. The problem of universals is closely related to the problem of reference, since many universals are referred to by words and other symbols.

Implications for Metaphysics and Ontology

The problem of universals has profound implications for metaphysics and ontology. Metaphysics is the study of the fundamental nature of reality, while ontology is the study of what kinds of things exist. The problem of universals challenges our understanding of both of these areas.

If universals are real, then they must be included in any complete ontology. This raises questions about the nature of reality and the relationship between the abstract and the concrete. Furthermore, if universals are real, then we must account for their existence and properties.

If universals are not real, then we must explain how we are able to talk about and refer to them. This raises questions about the nature of language and thought. Furthermore, if universals are not real, then we must account for how we are able to form general concepts and make universal claims.

The problem of universals is a complex and fascinating philosophical question that continues to challenge our understanding of reality. There is no single accepted solution, but the debate over universals has produced a rich body of philosophical literature and has helped to shape our understanding of the world around us.

Armstrong, David M. Universals: An Opinionated . Westview Press, 1989.
Boyd, Richard. Realism, Anti-Foundationalism, and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds. MIT Press, 1991.
Dretske, Fred I. Naturalizing the Mind. MIT Press, 1988.
Lewis, David. On the Plurality of Worlds. Basil Blackwell, 1986.
Millikan, Ruth Garrett. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories. MIT Press, 2004.
Putnam, Hilary. Reason, Truth, and History. Cambridge University Press, 1981.

Image Credits